Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gary Oliver's avatar

Keep up the discussions, much appreciated! Nice post. GLP-1 is worth thinking about as are the risk profiles of many of the drugs and the social considerations. I would respectfully consider that the following three sentences might be a little on the definitive side, especially the last two. "The core conclusion of the evidence around these “longevity drugs” is that there are no true longevity drugs, at least as of yet. There are no “longevity genes” we can activate to increase lifespan. And there are no “longevity proteins” we can activate or inhibit to increase lifespan, especially in already healthy people." As to why the sentences might be a little strong I would invite consideration of an introductory list of things that might make humans or mice live longer and why put together by Laura Deming

https://www.ldeming.com/longevityfaq#70drugs

Expand full comment
Oren Bahari's avatar

Potentially consider who the audience of this writing is and how you communicate detail. Some of medical explanation are rich in technical details and require assumed knowledge, but then explain concepts someone who had the assumed knowledge may already know. The best audience would likely be all smart people, so I think using links to assumed background and pithy all-you-need explainations, or veiling information in diagrams/visuals, could improve it. Nice work though!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts